TrueFacts.co.uk - Exposing the truth THEY don't want you to know
 

  •  
 
Backstabbing Toady Blair Gave Bin Laden £100,000!!!
posted to Usenet - 10th Oct 2002
Subject: Backstabbing Toady Blair Gave Bin Laden £100,000!!!
From: osama bin kenobi <abuse@anarchy.gov>
Newsgroups: alt.conspiracy,alt.conspiracy.america-at-war,alt.conspiracy.cabal,
 alt.conspiracy.new-world-order,alt.politics,alt.politics.usa,soc.culture.usa,
 soc.culture.yugoslavia,alt.journalism
Reply-To: "Rebel Alliance Galactic Usenet News Service
Date: Thu, Oct 10, 2002 7:10 am
Message-ID: <9j6aqu86lftmo0v386tgqirrjsf5nd0b43@4ax.com>

Ah, so that's why Al Qaeda has left Britain alone...

Tony Blair has tonight ordered a D-Notice on British media reporting
government officials signing court gag orders. This regards the case
of former MI5 officer David Shayler, who has evidence to prove MI6
gave £100,000 to bin Laden and Al-Qaeda, arms to Iraq and had prior
knowledge of several terrorist attacks on London in the 1990's.

The original articles stated that top Labour MP's had signed gag
orders, whereby upon mention of this evidence in court, media have to
immediately leave the trial. Newspapers all over the country,
including the Guardian, the London Evening Standard and the Scotsman
have either completely removed or amended their articles. This
evidence is damning. The British government is trying to bury the
story before it buries them.

I first noticed that the Guardian article I had earlier posted on my
website had disappeared. Already aware that Blair may well have
ordered a D-Notice to eliminate these reports, I immediately started
searching on Google for some more. In Britain, a D-Notice is where the
government order a gag on a particular breaking story. 

I came across a very similar London Evening Standard report and
immediately put it on my web site. Low and behold, five minutes later
the link was dead! Amazingly, I still had the article up on my screen
on a different browser window. I tried to archive the page to my
desktop but to no avail. I did manage to print out a copy which I have
scanned and linked below.

This story is massive because Shayler has them on the wracks on a
number of different issues, from colluding with bin Laden, to arms
deals with questionable characters. This could be particularly
embarrasing for Jack Straw, who I, using mainstream reports, have
identified as a key placeman in hawking arms to Pakistan, India and
even Iran. 

Bilderberg member Peter Mandelson is also trying to cover his dirt by
gagging these reports. The London Times reported how his new 'think
tank' was being bankrolled by the Rothschilds two weeks ago. The
Rothschilds control the BBC, who haven't even mentioned that the trial
has started, never mind the accusations Shayler raises.

The original London Guardian report was entitled 'Ministers issue gag
orders for MI5 trial' and was located at
http://www.guardian.co.uk/shayler/article/0,2763,806009,00.html - as
you will see if you click on the link, it's disappeared down the
memory hole. The text I extracted from the report for my original link
to it is as follows...

"Ministers issue gag orders for MI5 trial: They appear to be worried
that he will make further allegations about MI5 and MI6 knowledge of a
plot to assassinate the Libyan leader, Muammar Gadafy, in 1996. A
book, Forbidden Truth, published this summer claims that British
intelligence was in contact with "Osama bin Laden's main allies" who
were opposed to Colonel Gadafy."

The London Evening Standard article was entitled 'Calls for secret
Shayler trial' and was at
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/articles/1488303 - again, it has
now been removed. Luckily I saved the text to a Word file and printed
the article: 

Before you read this, it is important to understand the issue at hand.
We're talking about MI6 cooperation with bin Laden, arms to Iraq and,
as reported today in the Scotsman, claims that, 'secret services
ignored warnings that might have prevented bombings in the London in
1993 and 1994.' Shayler has evidence that MI5 wilfully failed to stop
the bomb attack on Israel's London embassy in 1994 and the IRA's 1993
Bishopsgate bombing, which killed one person. 

Here it is in Shayler's own words plus the actual MI6 Gaddafi plot
document - MI6 Plot to assassinate Colonel Gaddafi: Police enquiry
confirms Plot is not "fantasy" -
http://cryptome.org/shayler-gaddafi.htm

Here is the London Evening Standard report I managed to rescue.

Update! Take a look at the scans of the article I printed off - why
was it removed? Judge for yourself...(click on the images for big
versions)


 
This article has now been replaced with a shorter, watered down,
version of this story. It does not mention MI5's £100,000 transfer to
Al-Qaeda. Yet more evidence of a top down cover-up - read the new
whitewashed piece here and compare it to my scanned original that was
pulled along with all the others!


------------------------------------
The Scotsman also released a report which remains online but both the
title and the article have been amended!!! The new article talks about
new MI5 head Eliza Manningham-Buller, only mentioning the Shayler case
in passing. It certainly does not include information concerning the
Labour MP's involved and government prior knowledge of terrorist
bombings in London.

http://www.thescotsman.co.uk/index.cfm?id=1113312002 is the amended
version - I archived the original at
http://www.propagandamatrix.com/renegade_mi5_agent_to_face_jury.htm.
The report was originally entitled 'Renegade MI5 agent ready to face
jury' it is now called 'Has MI5 really emerged from shadows?' This is
the report with the most damning information (the one they erased).


Renegade MI5 agent ready to face jury
KAREN MCVEIGH
DAVID Shayler, the former M15 officer branded a traitor by the
government, is due to take on the legal establishment today, as his
trial opens at the Old Bailey in London. 

The renegade agent, who faces six years imprisonment for breaching the
Official Secrets Act after making a number of sensational revelations
about M15 to a national newspaper in 1997, will represent himself for
part of the landmark case. The trial will centre around a number of
allegations made by Shayler about M15 holding files on prominent
politicians, including former cabinet minister Peter Mandelson and
Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary. He also claimed the secret services
ignored warnings that might have prevented bombings in the London in
1993 and 1994. 

Shayler, 36, faces two charges under section one of the Official
Secrets Act for disclosing documents and information about the work of
M15 and another under section four, for disclosing information about
telephone taps. 

He has failed so far to win his argument that his revelations were in
the public interest. The High Court, Court of Appeal and the House of
Lords, have all ruled that he cannot claim he disclosed information in
the public interest or out of necessity. They also ruled out the main
plank of Shayler's defence - that the Officials Secrets Act is
incompatible with the Human Rights Act. 

Shayler, who made other allegations for which he was not charged,
including a claim that M16 was involved in a plot to assassinate the
Libyan leader, Colonel Muammar al-Gaddafi, will argue that he is only
guilty of "exposing wrongdoing". 

"I aim to persist in my argument that the Official Secrets Act as it
currently stands is totally incompatible with the Human Rights Act,"
he told a newspaper yesterday. 

Some of the hearing is expected to be taken up by an application by
newspapers objecting to plans to hold parts of the trial in secret. 

The prosecution applied for hearings to be held in camera after its
concerns that Shayler will make fresh allegations to the jury to back
up his public interest defence. 

Shayler's decision to defend himself, against the advice of his legal
team, for part of the trial was prompted by the belief that he will be
freer to argue his case than his barrister, Geoffrey Robertson, QC,
whose hands are tied by earlier court rulings.


***************
Even local papers such as the Leicestershire Mail and the Derby
Evening Telegraph have removed the story from their websites! The
original stories were here and here respectively. They were entiled
''SHAYLER AT OLD BAILEY FOR TRIAL' and 'SHAYLER ARRIVES FOR TRIAL.' As
you can see by clicking the links, they are gone. As is a London
Independent article that was entitled 'MI5 faces accountability test
as new chief takes reins.' 


***************
UPDATE: It is now confirmed that all details relating to the Shayler
case cannot be reported. The UK government have successfully gagged
the cowardly pathetic mainstream media, but I will continue to track
this story.

The Guardian reports - 'Shayler hearing'


'An Old Bailey court yesterday heard legal arguments relating to the
trial of David Shayler, the former MI5 officer charged with breaking
the Official Secrets Act. The judge ruled that they cannot be
reported. Mr Shayler's trial is now expected to be heard before a jury
next week.'
- Richard Norton-Taylor
Read this tiny blurb at
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,3604,806640,00.html (until they remove that too)

 Email Email this page to a friend

Last edit: 28th Sep 2008 at 2:13pm (280 days ago)

Bookmark with:What are these?
delicious
Delicious
digg
Digg
reddit
reddit
facebook
Facebook
stumbleupon
StumbleUpon

RSS Feed